The photo is fake. It's a collage of two different photos. The Blavatsky photo is well known and is a portrait with nobody else in the frame. Why resort to this kind of fakery?
This is actually a well known and circulated stock image of Olcott and Blavatsky together. Secondly, it's a podcast episode thumbnail image of two of the most influential theosophists that the episode specifically talks about. Did you listen to the episode? I'm not sure what kind of "fakery" you are referring to here.
No I didn't listen to the episode as of yet, I will. It was the photo that looked like a fake to me initially, but now I realize that the photo I recalled had her hand on her face and and she was alone. I retract the comment.
The photo is fake. It's a collage of two different photos. The Blavatsky photo is well known and is a portrait with nobody else in the frame. Why resort to this kind of fakery?
This is actually a well known and circulated stock image of Olcott and Blavatsky together. Secondly, it's a podcast episode thumbnail image of two of the most influential theosophists that the episode specifically talks about. Did you listen to the episode? I'm not sure what kind of "fakery" you are referring to here.
No I didn't listen to the episode as of yet, I will. It was the photo that looked like a fake to me initially, but now I realize that the photo I recalled had her hand on her face and and she was alone. I retract the comment.
btw
Have you read 'The Secret Doctrine?'